北木教育 > 雅思 > 雅思文章 > 5分和6分雅思写作的语法区别

北京超级学长 让学生找到好老师 在线咨询

5分和6分雅思写作的语法区别

# 语法 # 真题解析 # 评分标准

发布时间:2018-11-17 北京超级学长

雅思写作评分标准分为四项,其中最后一项为Grammatical Range and Accuracy(语法多样性及准确性 ),对于大部分中国考生而言应该是非常熟悉的考察对象,因为从中学,甚至是小学就开始接触和学习各种语法知识点,但是在实际考试过程中却并不理想 。这主要是因为不了解考官的评分标准,不能做到知己知彼。

5分和6分雅思写作的语法区别


BC阅卷官方对雅思语法划分为1-9,九个分数段。在此笔者以5分和6分两个分数段为例简单说明。5分语法要求:仅能使用有限的语法结构;试图使用复杂句,但复杂句的准确性常不及简单句的准确性;可能经常出现语法及标点符号使用的错误,这些错误会对读者造成一定的阅读困难。6分分的语法要求:综合使用简单句式与复杂句式;在语法及标点符号方面有一些错误,但这些错误很少影响交流。


1

5分语法


从5分分数段我们可以看出和推导出:“仅能使用有限的语法结构”是说文章中大部分句子都写的是简单句,而且简单句有少许语法错误,但是能清楚的表达出个人意思。“试图使用复杂句,但复杂句的准确性常不及简单句的准确性”意思是考生试着在文章中编写复杂句,但是大部分句子表达意思不能准确表达考生的意思。“可能经常出现语法及标点符号使用的错误,这些错误会对读者造成一定的阅读困难”不管是简单句还是复杂句,在使用过程中频繁出现语法和标点符号错误,这些问题让考官在阅读这些句子的时候难以理解或者读不懂。


如C3T1T1

This chart shows us that Japanese tourists go abroad for travelling in a decade and Australian's share of marketing for Japanese tourists. Between 1985 and 1995 Japanese tourists travelling abroad was dramatically increased. In 85 there was about 5 milions traveller go abroad, Since 85 number of traveller went up dramatically until 9o. It was almost twice then between 90 and 93 the number remain stateable, which is about 12 millions. From 93 to 95 it rose slightly. Therefore in 1995 there were about 15 millions people went abroad.


I am going to write about the other chart, which is Australian's share of Japanese's tourist market. This is also between 1985 and 1995. About 2 million Japanese tourist went to Australia in 1985. Between 85 and 89 people went there is increased sharply, which is almost 3 times more. In 1990 it fall number slightly but from 90 to 94 number is went up. However 94 to 95 is not so went up number of people who went to Australia. It rimains is the same or slightly decreased.


该作文官方评分为5分,从文章中可以看出考生尝试使用复杂句,但是基础和简单句子结构表意准确性远远高于复杂句。


2

6分语法



相对于5分语法要求,6分语法有质的提升。“综合使用简单句式与复杂句式”要求考生将简单句和复杂句搭配混合使用,并且句子能准确表达考生的意思。“在语法及标点符号方面有一些错误,但这些错误很少影响交流”则是说简单句和复杂句会偶尔出现一些语法和标点错误,但是这些错误不会影响考官对考生文章的理解。


如C5T3T2

Nowadays, purpose of education being changed in Korea There are some people who think that competition in children should be made, also others believe that children who are taught to co-operate as well as become more useful adults. There are advantages and disadvantages for both of the arguments.


    To begin with what is good if a sense of competition in children is made? They could develop themselves more and more as they learn and study a lot to win from the competition. To prove this, in Korea, it is popular—even common now—to have a tutor who come to student's house to teach extra pieces of study with paying a lot of money. They learn faster than what they learn at school. Furthermore, during the vacations, students study abroad to learn English for a month instead of revise school work. If they have experiments such as study abroad it is one of the greatest plus point to go to the famous well-known high- school. Moreover, there are four big school exam and two national examinations to test students’ level of studies. Generally, only the highest 40% can go to the good quality high schools and colleges. Children learn as much as they can, to win the competition to obtain good quality schools.


    On the other hand, as they are busy to enter the schools and study individually with their own tutors, there are problems. They become selfish. They become careless and don't help others a lot if it is about studies. There will be no co-operations for them. Then, why are there companies for many people to work in? Each of them are clever however there are weak parts and strong parts for each person. To co-operate is to improve this part People talk and listen to what others thinking of and learn That could also be a great opportunity to learn instead of learning alone with one teacher.


    In conclusion, I strongly agree with that children should be taught to co-operate rather than compete. Nobody is perfect. People learn together, work together to develop each other. Therefore, I want parents and teachers to educate children concentrating on co-operation, not compete and ranking them.


该文章官方评分为6分,从文章可以看出考生尝试使用多种语法结构,但是对标点和语法使用准确性方面把控不好,但是整体意思表达准。


结合理论和范文我们可以得出雅思对语法要求会更高、更细,考生除了正确表达语法知识点外,还应该将本身所掌握的语法知识系统化、体系化,这样才能综合和灵活使用语法,在题目话题限定下精确表达个人的观点和论证。

声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,北木教育系信息发布平台,北木教育仅提供信息存储空间服务。网站上部分文章为转载,并不用于任何商业目的,我们尽可能对作者和来源进行通告,但是因能力有限或疏忽,造成漏登,请及时联系我们,我们将根据著作权人的要求,立即更正或者删除相关内容。

Q&A