雅思网站

如何突破雅思写作7分？写作高分7分评分标准解析：

首先，统一性。

一篇优秀的作文不仅仅在于词汇与句式的表达上，更注重的是这篇文章是否满足了统一性的要求，也就是说文章是否紧扣主题，段落安排是否合理，句子论述是否恰到好处等等。统一性是指所写的作文应该紧扣主题，也就是作者的核心观点，并要注意人称、文体和时态上的一致。此外，文章内容要均衡，不偏多或缺少。

统一性除了从文章整体上来体现之外，还要求每个段落的句子同样要满足统一性。一个段落通常由主题句和扩展句所构成，所以句子统一性则体现在主题句和扩展句上面。主题句是一个段落必不可少的成分，是一个段落的核心所在，也就是作者想要表达的中心观点，在一个段落中主题句应该只说明一个问题，或是一个问题的某个方面。每段只应有一个中心，任何偏离中心之外的句子都是无用的。而扩展句则必须紧密围绕着这个中心，给予充分说明，通过分析和议论，从而形成一个有机的整体。总之，文章的统一性是判断雅思作文质量的重要标准之一，考生要多多重视。

其次，完整性。

文章仅仅有统一性还远远不够，完整性也是不可或缺的因素。文章段落的主题思想除了由主题句提出之外，还要依靠扩展句来实现，这就要求扩展句进一步补充和说明，比如举出具体事例加以证明，以便把主题解释清楚等，从而构成一个完整的段落。不过，即使扩展句表达充分，主题句却缺失或是没有恰当地表达出来，也会给读者一种意犹未尽的感觉。所以，只有保证文章的完整性才会让文章更加饱满贴切地表达出作者的所思所想，让读者理解的更加透彻。

最后，连贯性。

文章的连贯性与统一性紧密相关，是组词造句的基本要求。句子的统一性和连贯性是相辅相成的，统一性要求紧扣主题，而连贯性则要求整篇文章前后连贯，也要求句子和段落之间相互关联并衔接自然。此外，句子与句子之间也要有一种自然逻辑关系，进而形成有机的整体。但是很多考生在写作时往往想到哪写到哪，句子安排的乱七八糟，缺乏连续性，结果只能给读者留下一种不成文或是找不到逻辑的感觉。为了达到连贯性的要求，考生可以适当地运用一些连接词，比如therefore、however等等，让文章内容连接的更加自然顺畅。

案例:写作7分范文

Some people think a lot of scientific research done today is a waste of time and money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

考官范文（MODEL ANSWER）：

To assess whether something is a waste of time and money or not, I might have to first consider what “waste” is. There is of course a casual definition of what “waste” means, and usually it means “the stuff that I don't approve of,” but the take home message is that this rests entirely on how the word “waste” is defined.

Many consider scientific research a waste because in most cases, the time, energy, and efforts put in research are to no avail. To these people, anything that produces no immediate benefit is deemed “a waste.” It’s true that scientific research does take a ton of money, time and failures to produce anything useful, if anything at all. The enormous amount of time spent on data collection and analysis, money squandered on overpriced lab equipment and manpower due to (unfortunately) the politics at play on how research is funded and conducted, and the energy and resources consumed by the trial and retrial just to confirm the validity of the test are all well worth it if the product of the research is as applicable as it is valid. The sad reality, however, is that the contradiction between what is hypothesized and what the empirical data suggest often sends the researchers back to the drawing board. Worse yet, the difficulties involved in making the sciences applicable to real life are oftentimes too great, which left us humans to wonder why we even started the research in the first place.

The kind of myopic thinking exhibited in the paragraph above, as others would argue, is the rankest psychologism of all. This type of thinking doesn’t allow the people to see past the immediate return that any scientific research might bring and robs them of the opportunity to recognize the potential that lies within. Prior knowledge, or the premise of something, is what lays the foundation of the reasoning that follows. Certain fact or knowledge may not seem like much and certainly may not surmount to anything on its own. However, sets of related facts and data points grouped together are what constitute insights into new discoveries, which one day may also be the cornerstone of other even more crucial breakthroughs. Who is to say that the minute amounts of knowledge and data, which may seem insignificant at first, did not comprise the very fabric of our understanding of the world? And that we humans, as naturally inquisitive and rational beings, did not build our current understanding of the world on existing known facts? What short-term thinking does is that it distracts us from deep thinking, from being analytically curious, and from being able to connect the dots.

In conclusion, I would very much agree that financial resources allocated to the development of science is not a waste though the results aren’t immediate because I too share the gift of foresight of seeing the potential in any sort of research done on any particular subject.